Hi @dgudkov , thank you for your very quick response. I have completely overlooked the fact that the "Client Credential flow" was implemented. Thank you for updating the mentioned article, so when someone else stumbles upon this article, he/she does not make the same wrong assumptions like I did. We'll just have to upgrade to the latest version to get this feature, nice!
For the second: the 'shared memory' can indeed help within my situation. However it is not completely secure... it is way better than the workaround that I was planning to implement.
So thank you very very very much! Highly appreciated.
Kr.
Edward